After reading Mary Jane Kehily’s article, “Taking centre
stage? Girlhood and the contradictions of femininity across three generations,”
I paused at McRobbie and Garber’s starting point with speculation that
the relative absence of girls in
subcultures may hinge around issues of gender and space, with girls being more
centrally involved in the ‘private’ domestic sphere of home and family life
rather than the ‘public’ world of the street where most subcultural activities
seem to occur.” (53)
Assuming this is so, the future of girlhood and identities
will be less of a “topic” for discussion and research in terms of seeking
audience for girlhood studies.
Because females are no longer predominantly placed in the “domestic
sphere” and are heard more frequently in the “public” world, I believe that the
conversations on girlhood and female identity will change over time.
This is not to say, however, that I believe the research and
focus no longer need to exist because females are out of the private
sphere. This is not so, and of course;
I am only speaking from a Western experience. Globally, female and girl positionalities vary, thus
necessitating varying discussions via varying forms of media.
I believe that we will begin to hear more voices, candid
responses, covert and overt voices of resistance, as women find and realize the
necessity of creating space for sharing.
totally agreed.
ReplyDelete