Shade’s article provides a
historicity of the commodification of girl community through corporate
alliances, mergers, buyouts, advertising media, cross-promotional strategies,
and more. Her article ties nicely to Harris’s article on “Jamming Girl Culture:
Young Women and Consumer Citizenship” which discusses the “conflation of power
with consumption” thus positioning “girls as powerful citizens only when they
consume” (Harris 167). We see that this idea reinforces the old gender
dichotomy where men are perceived as money makers and women are perceived as
spenders, and consequently men are perceived as cultural producers and women as
consumers. Postfeminist “Girl Power” advertising culture has not helped to
break down this stereotype. It still positions women as “citizen consumers”
with the added image of the empowered working girl who buys a lifestyle as a display
of her success and independence (e.g. Carrie Bradshaw’s character on Sex and
the City is a prime example of this).
Moreover, we see that Shades’s
article on “Gender and the Commodification of Community” extends Harris’s arguments
by tracing the feminization of the internet through Women.com and gURL.com’s unsettling
history of commodifying girl identities. Such a tracing highlights the need to
put girls in the driver’s seat as producers of culture who find creative ways
to resist and subvert “Girl Power” advertising culture through culture jamming,
zines, and the rewriting of cultural texts that produce and reproduce postfeminist views of consumerism as citizenship.
"It still positions women as “citizen consumers” with the added image of the empowered working girl who buys a lifestyle as a display of her success and independence." This is my favorite part of your post! Sadly, it is so true that women buy a lifestyle promoted by the advertiser with the biggest budget.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteRobyn,
ReplyDeleteI like the idea of women making their presence felt through writing and other activities, but I think there is an economic side to this debate. How does this paradigm of women as consumers differ in countries where people save more money such as Germany? Can our economic actions affect this stereotype as well?
I'm thinking about this idea of the feminization of the internet. I agree that much of what we do online is often categorized as feminine (social networking, shopping, saving/currating data) but how is the space itself reflective or not of feminine ideals? I mean, I think most Web designers are still men so do online spaces look different than the activities they are built to support?
ReplyDeleteIs the answer a gurl.com reboot under another name? Do we just redefine a new space sans what we don't like about the corporate webpages?
ReplyDelete