Christine made me realize that I too feel or once felt that games were something that made me feel as if I were not doing
anything productive-a gendered socialization differential regarding idle time. Then I recalled the speech that Jane
Mcgonical made for TED Talks about gaming for the future, and, as I googled her name for the original speech, found her currently appearing on the Colbert Report (which does not do her justice). Imagine my surprise when the first rhetoric was
‘games are productive.” It is best to watch her initial speech from ted, but I
don’t want to inundate you. Here is the Colbert report link however:
Christine made me feel okay because she did not play games but alas, she thought of SIMS. Aaagh! I am alone again as I play no games at all. My son has them. My daughter has them. He would have played them all the time (alone or with friends) if I had let him. My daughter was not
interested unless they could play together, but she did not
play hours at a time by herself as he did. It is mentioned in the Royse article that girls do play in groups (681).
From reading Royse et
al, I feel this gives us the idea that games are still something that ‘ is played’
in the sense of fun. However, the article talks about a sense of self.
This is where McGonigal seems to be helpful. Games are now being created to
explore, create, examine, help others. The gendered nature is reinstated. McGonigal’s game is more suited for women because it is more nurturing.
In a different link, but same idea (dealing with feelings or emotion), some of the research does suggest that
women do not have as much time to play. It supports what we were
saying-we feel guilty playing games and not getting our work done. (the nexus
of domestic power on page 682). Interestingly, then, is the study by Royse et al., because they take into account ‘the
gendered self.’ As they mention, ‘…
women negotiate technologies and how their various work of negotiation can
produce different results and …interpretations of the consumption of technology
as a gendered practice (683). Thus, my point is, even though my only encounter
with gaming is the idea of gaming, I bring it back to TED talks where Laurel http://www.ted.com/talks/brenda_laurel_on_making_games_for_girls.html discusses early research on girls and gaming. She studied and found that girls have desires to experience
greater emotional flexibility” and “play around with their social complexity of
their lives.” It is at the end of this
video that you might find very interesting. (by the second half she shows the
game of Rocket).
I really enjoyed your links. I especially like the idea that girls need/crave emotional flexibility in gaming. Moreover, I wonder if the freedom they seek has something to do with the traditional pink think notion that girls should be reticent, should try to remain "bottled-up" about their intimate feelings.
ReplyDeleteThese Ted links are a nice compliment to the readings. Thanks for sharing.
ReplyDeleteWhat great links! Thanks for including the TED link--I found that really interesting that even little girls are saying they are bombarded by swim practice and family, etc. I like the idea of girls being able to navigate through their emotions!
ReplyDeleteI love the conversation you are having in this post with other bloggers! Glad you were able to pull in personal experiences with our readings. And thanks for great links!
ReplyDelete