My response to this blog is why would I not want to take
this course? It seems that as much of a fight there has been in the past 50-150
years about feminism and women’s equality, women seem to still be working on
the same issues. Women want to be equal. Women want to know that their lives,
work, and livelihood are taken seriously. But possibly the problem might not be
the extreme, in your face, overt inequalities or stereotypes that continue.
Possibly the problem starts very slowly from the beginning of life. Therefore,
the title of the course intrigues me, in that, the idea to go back and look at ‘girlhood
representations’ is a fascinating idea.
As women are finding more equitable living standards here in
the United States, there is still a long way to go to create a place that is
safe. The word safe has so many parts to it. ‘Safe’ means to be able to voice
one’s opinion without the fear of retribution for being “emotional,” or being considered
‘crazy.’ Another fear is speaking up in
an interview saying ‘I would like my starting salary to be more than that’
without being made to feel that one is being too aggressive. Safe means knowing that it is forces beyond
one’s interpersonal abilities that causes abusive relationships, or attitudes
that discriminate. Fear entails many different issues that are not being
addressed.
My hope is to dig deeply into the rhetoric behind the
rhetoric of gendered representations by the media. The course description
sounds to be exactly what my hope refers. It will be challenging to unpack the point
of post-feminism to see why that glass ceiling does not shatter into a billion
pieces. One more huge push to continue the conversation will help, but it is
not enough to continue the conversation. Perhaps the conversation must be
changed or tweaked a little bit. Perhaps taking a few steps back will help this
dialogue, not only to continue, but change it for the better. I am looking
forward to all that is required.
I am fascinated where these ideas about being overly emotional, too aggressive or irrational come from. These are clearly cultural stereotypes and I am hoping some of the work we can do in this course will be to find out how these tropes of womanhood and girlhood are made and perpetuated.
ReplyDeleteJust as there is no one womanhood there is no one girlhood, and yet we are eager - as a society - to package it and sell it and make everyone subscribe to it.
I'm really interested in what you're calling "the rhetoric behind the rhetoric of gendered representations" because I think language and the way it is used, not only to label but to reproduce a set of prescripted ways of acting or perceiving the feminine, is crucial to the understanding of gender on the whole.
ReplyDelete