Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Oh! The Marketing!!! I have to have every piece - really! I do!! Or, do I??


           It was unfortunate, after reading, “Kiddie Pink,” that I realized having experienced girlhood in the late 70s, 80s and into the early 90s, that not much had really changed.  Charm schools weren’t necessarily being advertised, but there was definitely a huge push on Barbie dolls, doll sections in stores made up numerous aisles, and I remember a huge marketing push in my teens where everything was pink and purple.  I had a pink phone, a purple boom box, a pink alarm clock, a pink iron (for my room, because my dad wouldn’t use it – go figure), and hot pink bathroom mats.  It seemed like everything was “pink washed!”  This didn’t even begin to touch the Hello Kitty items for sale, and the boy band marketing taking place where NKOTB were concerned, and solo acts like Michael Jackson.

            So, yes!  Marketing to girls seems to play into class and acceptance in ways that other marketing takes place, but on a hyperactive level.  Girls are sold to differently, for certain.  They are sold to in collections, i.e., Polly Pockets, Barbie and all of her accessories, in kits, in many parts and pretty pieces.  There isn’t just a Caboodle case to carry a million pieces of make-up, but also the train case for traveling, the acrylic case for the vanity, the many tiny make up bags to take to work, school, and gym.  We are sold to, to have it all, to have every little pretty piece.  Wasn’t it enough to have Barbie?  Did we have to have her Jeep and Corvette, and swimming pool too?  Yes.  We did.  Because poor girls just had Barbie, but the girls with money had her camping set with vehicle, etc. 

            In girlhood, marketing takes place just as it does in womanhood.  They market the life you want.  They market to the life that a girl or woman wishes she had.  I sell houses.  Many times I have heard a woman say something to the effect of, “I have to have a house with a bay window by which I can put a reading area, to sit and read on Sunday mornings.”  After much rapport building and not being able to find the right setting within this woman’s price range, I ask the hard question, “How is your read/sitting area situated now?”  The answer usually reveals that this is what she wants, not what she has, and is a reflection of the life she wants, not the life she has.  Sunday mornings are usually crammed with getting kids ready for church, breakfast, laundry, homework, and make way for little sitting and reading time.  Girls and women often are marketed to for the life they want, the gathering of girl friends, the boyfriend, the full set of accessories marketed in the photo, commercial, or ad.  Into the golden years, after reading, it is apparent that we still fall into the same traps.  These women are being sold items that make life easier, because they can remember a time, when they had to do things the hard way.  They are buying the class and luxury they weren’t privy to when they were newlyweds or new brides (speaking to or against their own wishes).       





5 comments:

  1. I like how your post really gets to the class lifestyle that’s being sold to young girls, teen girls, and women. Advertisers are certainly selling an ideal lifestyle to female consumers who fall into “the trap” (as you say) of using cultural artifacts (e.g. Barbie and all her possessions) as way to communicate their feminine identities and class status.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The concept of acceptable femininity being linked to products is key to this class - and to understanding gender roles in our society, I think. I love what you are saying about girls using products to practice being what they want to be - wife, mother, fashionista. We talk often in composition studies about people writing themselves into being, but it seems that consumers now are being asked to buy themselves into being - either proper boys or girls or in training as men and women.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I enjoyed the quote from "Children as Consumers" that "markets are not meeting needs but creating needs." You response fits it perfectly.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I too experienced girlhood in the late 70's, 80's, and 90's. My femininity was linked to those products, but being raised by a single mother, and not having all the products and accessories -- what did that say about my femininity? So experiencing lack is maybe attributed to not being enough of a girl? Hmmm...I have never really thought about that. Class and femininity -- awesome observation.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks for bringing up girlhood and differing lifestyles (class) in how that defines feminitity. I found your realtor comment extremely interesting as well--it's true that society keeps seeming to want to push expectations on what it means to be a full fledged female (Pinterest, bridal shows, fashion week, etc.) all these glamourize accessories targeted to this ideal female--especially with pinterest--we keep pinning and pinning on accessories we want, organizational techniques and advice to make females become some perfect career/educated/homemaker/hipster that there's not enough time in the day to become.

    ReplyDelete