After reading Pink Think and “From Badness to Meanness: Popular Constructions of
Contemporary Girlhood” I came to two conclusions. Growing up in the time of Pink Think must
have been one of the weirdest times for young women. Second, was the bad girl of the 80's and 90's
a challenge for young girls to be like boys are better than boys?
Growing up in the Pink Think era had to having been a difficult time for maturing girls. Being told that to be feminine one had to
follow the advice of all these papers, magazines, even actresses just so they
could find a man that they could settle down with and do whatever he wants them
to do. For little girls, if they wanted
to play with toys, theses toys had to be pink for them to be girl toys sounds a
bit extraneous. With what seems like the entire media force, telling young
women that to be a feminine woman, one had to wear pink explains a lot about
what could be called an obsession with the color pink in today society. In elementary school, if you were to ask the
girls what their favorite color is, I would expect 85% or more to answer that
pink is their favorite color. If you
asked them why, they would say because all of their toys and Barbie dolls are
pink. My little sister was a prime
example of this. Our living room seemed
to be overwhelmed with the amount of Barbies that she had. Studying how the media expects girls to
behave helps us understand why they act the way they do later in life. How many magazines are there out there
telling women nowadays how they should dress or how they should act? What kind of car they should drive? What kind of make-up they should wear? Make-up, is what I believe is the biggest
feminine, Pink Think, product out
there. If a girl wants to grow up to be
a very feminine women, she must learn at a young age to wear make-up. When did it become common practice for women
to cover up their natural figure with powders that are supposed to make them
look beautiful and feminine. And the
worst part of make-up are the women who take it over board. The ones that put on what seems like a
mountain of it so when they end up taking it off at night they need two wash
rags and a full shower just to get it off.
I dated one of these girls during my undergrad studies. When we would go out on a date, she would
take almost two hours to get ready. That
included a shower, "doing" her hair, putting her make up on, and getting
dressed. I swear I would have to tell
her to get ready for a date at 6pm at 3 in the afternoon. When did that kind of dress become the norm
for women?
“From Badness to Meanness: Popular Constructions of
Contemporary Girlhood” hits closer to home than Pink Think did. My older
sister was one of those bad girls that had to prove she was just as strong if
not stronger than the boys. Now she
didn't join a gang or anything like that, but she was one of the girls that
would do anything the boys did because she could do it. She renounced pink as her favorite color long
before I was born and pick anti-pink, aka black, as her favorite color and let
everyone know this. When I was older
enough to play with her, she would always want to play sports or rough house
and when she would beat me she would declare as loud as she desired that I got
beat by a girl which meant girls were better than boys. Oddly enough, most of the girls I knew from
my childhood to then end of middle school who played sports, were the type of
girl who had to prove that they were better than boys. I was like they had a chip on their shoulder
from a previous life that they just had to settle. Granted, these personal experiences are
nowhere close to having served in a gang but for me they are mellowed versions
of those girls. The one joining gangs
were the ones out the show that they could do whatever they want, no matter
what society had to say. They were in
essence, rebels, to the Pink Think movement.
After must thought, girlhood studies matter in academy today
so that current and future women, as well and men who are willing to listen,
have the knowledge to understand why society expects what they do from them and
give them the power to do whatever they decide to do. Understanding history and learning from it is
the only way to move forward. Studying
this is just one way to gather information on the societal functions that
coincide with girlhood.
Historically, middle and upper-class individuals spent a lot of time dressing. So, I don't think it is a new concept. Men as well as women wore multilayers of clothes and changed their clothes for different occasions everyday. Think of powdered wigs and the excesses of Louis XIV. I have heard that the only article of clothing not first designed for men was the bra. Elizabeth I wore a lot of makeup to cover the marks of small pox, and going further back, the Egyptians, men and women, wore makeup also.
ReplyDeleteSo this idea of appearance and masquerading seems very human for males and females. I wonder what happened to make it seem like a female phenomenon. I do think with the feminist movement some women have started to place less emphasis on appearance.
And my 19-year-old son takes more time to get ready to go somewhere than my daughters. ( :
I'm wondering if you see men facing the same sort of consumer pressures to clean up/be made up as women. Do boys need to play with certain toys, teens to drive the right car? I think consumerism as a means to create and perform one's identity is a growing trend, probably one that blossoms as we have more and more disposable income. I hope we learn not only what these sorts of mediated, consumerist messages have to say to women and girls, but also what these sorts of messages mean to all genders.
ReplyDelete